Georgia Local Government · NIST CSF 2.0
A fixed-scope Municipal Cybersecurity Risk & NIST CSF 2.0 Assessment for Georgia cities, counties, authorities, and agencies. Leadership receives a scored current state, a prioritized risk register, a remediation roadmap, and a briefing it can act on.
Cities · Counties · Authorities · Agencies
The Problem
Ransomware, vendor compromise, and outages hit public services directly: utilities, public safety, records, payments. Without an objective baseline, it is hard to know which investments matter most.
The Assessment
Scope, schedule, and deliverables are agreed in writing before work starts.
People, processes, systems, and vendors as they operate today.
Scored results across Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover.
Findings and implications written for decision-makers.
Each risk rated, owned, and linked to a recommended treatment.
Sequenced near-, mid-, and long-term actions.
A working session with leadership on results and decisions.
Confirm departments, systems, vendors, and stakeholders. Fix scope and schedule.
Interviews, document review, and evidence checks against NIST CSF 2.0.
Score findings, build the risk register, and sequence the roadmap.
Deliver the report and brief leadership on priorities and next steps.
After the Assessment
Each service maps to findings in your roadmap. Engage only what you need.
Governance
Develop or update the cybersecurity policies, standards, and procedures your findings call for.
Resilience
A practical response plan with roles, contacts, decision points, and communications.
Readiness
Scenario-based sessions that test the plan with leadership and staff.
Third Parties
Inventory critical vendors, set expectations, and track the risk they carry.
Continuity
Plan for keeping essential services running through a cyber event.
Leadership
Ongoing security leadership and program oversight without a full-time hire.
The DOJ's Title II rule sets WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the technical standard for state and local government web content and mobile apps.
This readiness assessment shows where your public-facing sites and documents stand and what to address first. It can be scoped alongside the cybersecurity assessment.
How to Buy
We work within your purchasing policies and can respond through the route your organization uses.
Written quote and statement of work for purchases handled under your small-purchase procedures.
Formal response to your solicitation, with a compliance matrix where required.
Delivered as a subcontractor to your existing IT provider or integrator.
Scope and documentation aligned to the grant program funding the work.
Purchasing methods and thresholds vary by jurisdiction. We follow your current purchasing ordinance and procedures.
Questions
Duration depends on the size of your organization, number of departments and systems, and stakeholder availability. The schedule is fixed during scoping, before any work starts.
The core assessment relies on interviews, document review, and evidence checks. Any technical testing is optional and agreed in writing during scoping.
Typically the city or county manager or a designee, IT leadership or your IT provider, finance, and department heads for critical services. We keep time demands predictable.
Evidence handling is agreed before any information is shared. We do not accept CJIS or other restricted data until an engagement-specific handling approach is approved.
Yes. The assessment gives leadership an independent view of governance and risk, and it gives your provider a clear, prioritized plan to work from.
Yes. Many organizations scope both together. Ask during the scoping call.
Start with a 30-minute scoping call covering your environment, your purchasing route, and what the assessment would include.
Request a Municipal Cybersecurity Assessment